Politics
/
January 23, 2026
On this week’s Elie v. US, The Nation’s justice correspondent reminds us why authorities issues—and why ICE has nothing to do with precise authorities.
Advert Coverage
Protesters stand exterior the Henry Bishop Whipple Federal constructing in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
(Jim Vondruska / Getty Photos)
It is a preview of Nation Justice Correspondent Elie Mystal’s new weekly publication. Click on right here to obtain this article in your inbox every Friday.
Earlier this week, the Trump administration tried to prosecute journalist Don Lemon for his protection of protests inside a Minneapolis church. The protesters had flooded the church to name for the resignation of pastor David Easterwood, who allegedly works for ICE. However on Thursday, a federal Justice of the Peace in Minnesota rejected the legal grievance filed by the Division of Justice—a ruling that allegedly “enraged” Legal professional Common Pam Bondi.
Two activists, Nekima Levy Armstrong and Chauntyll Louisa Allen, have been arrested by the FBI in reference to the protest.
There was numerous naysaying about these protests, particularly from “By no means Trumpers.” At the same time as individuals are coalescing round the concept ICE must be stopped, the sight of individuals protesting inside a church has given the moderates a chance to seem, nicely, average in regards to the strategies for dispelling ICE.
I’m not the protest police, however I’ll say that there are good First Modification causes to guard the sanctity of homes of worship. Defending individuals from being harassed whereas they’re inside their locations of worship is the legally proper factor to do to guard individuals’s free train of faith, even when we predict the individuals worshiping are misguided and even evil indirectly. Protesting exterior of an individual’s church (or home) is nice. Protesting inside an individual’s sanctuary is violative, and unnecessarily so.
I’ll additionally level out that ICE commonly violates these sanctuaries, and that defending individuals from authorities interference of their locations of worship is much more vital than defending individuals from personal actions.
Present Subject

There are even stronger First Modification–primarily based causes to guard the suitable of journalists to cowl such protests. Attempting to cost Lemon for masking protests inside a church is the better assault on the First Modification.
I’ve seen numerous hand-wringing from on-line moderates over the protests contained in the church. I haven’t seen sufficient outrage over the state harassment of a journalist like Lemon for masking the factor that alerted all of the moderates to get their underwear in a bunch. I believe if you’re extra involved about personal acts of resistance than state acts of totalitarianism, you’re doing it unsuitable.
The Dangerous and the Ugly
The Division of Justice isn’t limiting its harassment to particular person activists. The DOJ served subpoenas to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey as a part of its “investigation” into official resistance to Trump’s fascist insurance policies.
After all, activists, journalists, and elected officers have numerous choices to defend themselves. You recognize who doesn’t? Little youngsters. This week ICE detained 4 Minneapolis schoolchildren. Together with a 5-year-old. There are individuals who don’t prefer it once I name ICE “evil.” These individuals are unsuitable.
Even the individuals who have supported ICE prior to now may be beginning to understand the evil they’ve been part of. A brand new ballot exhibits {that a} majority of white individuals with no faculty schooling now disapprove of ICE. I’m not too excited by that information: Disapproving of ICE is way completely different from altering their fascist voting patterns and their rejoining the group of respectable people. Nevertheless it’s one thing.
Final week, the FBI seized paperwork from the house of a Washington Submit reporter, in a direct assault on the First Modification. This week, a Justice of the Peace choose prevented the feds from trying on the paperwork they seized. I’m fairly certain Kash Patel or whoever has already checked out all of the illegally seized paperwork. Nevertheless it’s one thing.
A California invoice proposes to ban native cops from taking a second job with ICE. A few of those who work forces, are the identical that burn crosses.
Impressed Takes
I haven’t lined the Trump versus Europe struggle over Greenland at Davos (besides satirically) as a result of billionaire assholes preventing over melting glaciers the place 50,000 individuals make their house is simply an excessive amount of whiteness for me at this stage of my life. The Nation’s Chris Lehmann has you lined although.
The Nation’s Peter Kornbluh asks, “Is Cuba Subsequent?” A Bay of Pigs II looks as if a bizarre factor to threat, however the Trump administration has doomed us to endlessly relitigating all the pieces that’s occurred since 1865.
I personally attempt to keep targeted on the long run. On this piece, Alan Elrod makes an argument I’ve been making since Joe Biden took workplace: There isn’t a going again to a pre-Trump world. No restoration of the previous norms is feasible. Trump has achieved an excessive amount of harm and proven decisively that our establishments are usually not designed to cease him or anyone else who needs to proceed what he’s achieved.
Advert Coverage
Standard
“swipe left under to view extra authors”Swipe →
Worst Argument of the Week
To know this week’s worst argument, it’s essential to take a second to understand the easiest argument, which was made by the state of Hawaii. In 2022’s New York State Rifle & Pistol Affiliation v. Bruen, the Supreme Court docket eviscerated gun laws on this nation. The court docket introduced that for a gun legislation to exist within the trendy period, it needed to have some historic analogue to a gun legislation that existed at or earlier than the founding of the nation. To manage an Uzi, it’s a must to present {that a} “historic twin” regulation utilized to a musket.
The rule is past silly as an mental proposition, however it’s additionally virtually unworkable. What’s an in depth sufficient “historic analogue”? No one is aware of. Since Bruen, the Supreme Court docket has been attempting to make it up because it goes alongside.
Effectively, Hawaii checked out all that chaos and stated “problem accepted.” The state handed a gun legislation particularly designed to both meet Bruen’s preposterous standards or, in the end, expose the court docket’s deep hypocrisy when making use of Bruen. The legislation requires gun house owners to obtain express permission from property house owners earlier than they’ll deliver their weapons onto personal property. It’s been dubbed the “vampire rule,” primarily based on the trope that vampires must obtain permission earlier than getting into your private home.
In line with the Supreme Court docket’s personal logic in Bruen, Hawaii’s legislation ought to be upheld. The state can cite historic analogues for its guidelines that go nicely past Nosferatu. In 1763 and 1771, New York and New Jersey respectively imposed related restrictions.
And but, the legislation isn’t going to carry (right here’s the place we get to the “worst” argument half). As Ian Millhiser explains, “[I]t seems that none of this historical past truly issues, as all six of the Court docket’s Republicans…signaled Tuesday that they’re more likely to strike the legislation down.”
To perform this hypocrisy, the core Republican argument was that the Second Modification ought to be handled like some other constitutional proper, and the federal government can not basically enact a previous restraint on constitutional rights. However that argument that the Second Modification ought to be handled like some other modification fails the Republicans’ personal necessities, specified by Bruen, that the Second Modification is so tremendous particular that trendy laws have to be tied to a selected traditionally analogous legislation earlier than it may be enacted. No different constitutional modification will get that safety. If the Second Modification is to be handled like each different one, then all the logic of Bruen ought to collapse.
However the Republicans on the Supreme Court docket need it each methods, and since they’ve a supermajority, they’ll have it each methods. When a gun regulation doesn’t have a doppelgänger from the 18th freaking century, Republicans will strike down the legislation as a result of the Second Modification allegedly means the identical factor now because it did then. When a gun regulation does have a doppelgänger from the 18th century, the Republicans will strike down the legislation as a result of the Second Modification magically means one thing completely different now from what it meant then.
The one true technique to observe the Republicans’ logic on the Second Modification is to ask the query: “Will this result in individuals being shot to demise?” If sure, the Republicans on the Supreme Court docket are in favor of it.
What I Wrote
The Supreme Court docket additionally heard oral arguments this week in Trump v. Cook dinner, the case regarding Trump’s makes an attempt to fireside Fed Reserve Board Commissioner Lisa Cook dinner. Almost certainly, this may go down as a uncommon loss for Trump in entrance of his court docket. Why? I clarify that it’s all in regards to the cash.
In Information Unrelated to the Present Chaos
Apparently, it’s going to snow this weekend. Loads. Just about in all places (no, not you, San Diego. You individuals will proceed to take pleasure in your excellent climate… till the earth swallows you entire).
Snowstorms, and climate occasions normally, actually spotlight the isolation of the trendy human situation. We don’t come collectively forward of these items; we go to floor. Earlier than Trump got here to the White Home, I used to be fairly certain that the nadir of American tradition could possibly be witnessed at a Costco 24 hours earlier than a snowstorm or hurricane.
I can’t even say the hoarding mentality is unsuitable, or a minimum of I can’t say that it’s irrational, as a result of the opposite factor climate occasions do is spotlight how desperately most individuals depend on authorities companies. If the federal government doesn’t clear the roads, individuals can’t get to work, together with the individuals whose jobs are to maintain all the opposite companies and infrastructure up and working.
I’m comparatively privileged, however this week a small half broke in my furnace, and I used to be with out warmth for twenty-four hours. I used to be capable of get it fastened however, if that had occurred throughout the snowstorm… no person might come to repair my drawback if the town didn’t plow the roads. I would like the federal government to operate so I may even entry my privilege, and I would like it to operate probably the most when issues are all screwed up.
However that’s the factor about authorities: When it’s working, most individuals don’t discover it. When it’s not working, individuals certain as shit discover it, however most individuals don’t carry that information by Election Day. Accountability hardly ever follows catastrophe. Final July, a rainstorm killed 27 campers and counselors at Camp Mystic in Texas; not one of the politicians accountable, together with Texas Governor Gregg Abbott, has paid a worth for the inaction. However a few individuals have been fired from their jobs for making inappropriate social media posts after the tragedy.
After all, I’ve simply defined the basically asymmetrical battle Democrats must struggle day by day. Republicans say authorities doesn’t work, then they make authorities not work. Then when authorities doesn’t work individuals say, “See, authorities doesn’t work” and vote for Republicans. Democrats say authorities can work, and once they make it work… no person notices or cares.
Backside line: If New York Metropolis handles the snowstorm nicely, I would like Zorhan Mamdani doing an advert with a snow shovel saying, “you’re welcome.” Lord is aware of he’ll be blamed if issues don’t go nicely, regardless that he hasn’t been on the job lengthy sufficient to reform New York’s snow preparedness system.
Keep protected, and heat, this weekend. And if issues go nicely or go to shit, attempt to bear in mind why.
***
In case you loved this installment of Elie v. U.S., click on right here to obtain the publication in your inbox every Friday.


